
By Michael Scissons
Let’s get specific.
Everyone’s talking about AI reshaping work — but very few are naming where actual shrinkage is going to happen.
We’re not talking about philosophical displacement. We’re talking about the next 3–5 years of headcount and org design.
Because it’s already happening.
In the AI economy, some roles will vanish, others will evolve — and a few will expand dramatically. The real shift is structural: from execution layers to systems leverage.
If you’re a CEO, CHRO, or investor, the question is no longer “Will AI change our org?”
The question is: Where will we shrink, and where should we reinvest?
Most companies have long operated with a hidden inefficiency baked into their orgs:
AI is exposing these inefficiencies — fast. And the best operators aren’t panicking. They’re planning.
Let’s break this down:
Function Type -> AI Impact -> Net Org Effect
Admin & Execution -> High automation, low differentiation -> Shrinks dramatically
Translation & Ops -> Partial automation, tool expansion -> Evolves, consolidates
Judgment & Strategy -> AI-augmented, human-led -> Expands and gains leverage
Now let’s go deeper.
These aren’t bad people. These are roles built on repeatability, formatting, or reactive process.
Why: Scheduling, email filtering, travel booking, light note-taking — all now AI-augmented with tools like x.ai, Motion, and Superhuman’s AI assistant.
Expected Shift:
Why: When project tracking, Gantt charts, meeting summaries, and nudges can be automated, the role of coordinator becomes tech-enabled.
Expected Shift:
Why: AI can now generate blog posts, landing pages, SEO copy, and email variants faster than any junior marketer.
Expected Shift:
Why: AI agents already handle up to 40–60% of inbound tickets in B2B SaaS and consumer support — with CSAT increasing.
Expected Shift:
Why: When GPT-powered tools can ingest data, visualize trends, and draft insights, junior analyst layers compress.
Expected Shift:
Why: Interactive AI tutors, onboarding copilots, and training modules are replacing decks, LMS systems, and workshops.
Expected Shift:
These are translation and coordination-heavy roles that won’t disappear — but will get refactored.
Why: AI helps write specs, summarize user research, and generate feature ideas — but PMs still need to prioritize, validate, and lead.
Expected Shift:
Why: Reporting, playbook creation, and sales training are now semi-automated. But RevOps still owns design and accountability.
Expected Shift:
Why: AI can now write job descriptions, screen resumes, and generate compensation benchmarks. But HRBPs remain central to people strategy.
Expected Shift:
Why: With AI flagging churn, drafting QBRs, and summarizing product usage — the CSM role becomes about relationships, not reports.
Expected Shift:
Why: AI now supports research, personalization, objection handling, and call summarization.
Expected Shift:
These aren’t traditional roles. These are the new centers of leverage.
Why: Someone needs to own internal AI transformation. Cross-functional, roadmap-driven, and outcome-oriented.
Expected Shift:
Why: Companies need people who design how tools talk to each other — and how humans interact with them.
Expected Shift:
Why: AI can generate content, but can’t originate tone or concept. Human taste becomes more valuable.
Expected Shift:
Why: When coordination and execution are AI-supported, the humans that remain are the ones who know what to build next.
Expected Shift:
Flatter. Faster. Sharper.
Visualize your current org chart.
Now:
You don’t need a reorg deck. You need a refactor.
Here’s how to plan:
This isn’t about reducing people. It’s about raising the bar on what those people can do.
The AI economy isn’t theoretical anymore. It’s here. And your org will change — whether you drive that change or react to it.
Some roles will disappear. Some will evolve. But the most valuable ones will be those that own systems, drive outcomes, and operate with judgment.
If you want to build a company that scales in the next 10 years, build one that gets leaner, faster, and more human — not one that gets stuck trying to preserve the org chart of the past.
Sources & Data: